Executive Summary
The Week 12 matchup between the Baltimore Ravens and Los Angeles Chargers presented a fascinating Harbowl revival, marking the first coaching confrontation between John and Jim Harbaugh since Super Bowl XLVII. The game, played at SoFi Stadium on November 25, 2024, resulted in a 30-23 victory for the Baltimore Ravens, cementing their position in the AFC North race while challenging the Chargers’ defensive reputation.
Match Context and Pre-Game Expectations
The Baltimore Ravens entered this matchup with a 7-3 record, seeking redemption after a disappointing loss to the Pittsburgh Steelers in Week 11. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Chargers at 7-2 aimed to maintain their momentum from four consecutive victories and strengthen their playoff positioning. The game marked a historic coaching rivalry renewal, with John Harbaugh’s Ravens facing Jim Harbaugh’s Chargers in what media dubbed “Harbowl II” – their first matchup as opposing coaches since Super Bowl XLVII a decade earlier.
Betting markets established the Ravens as slight favorites with an over/under reflecting anticipation of a high-scoring affair. Analysts highlighted several compelling storylines: Baltimore’s struggling pass defense versus Justin Herbert’s efficient offense, the Ravens’ ground game led by Derrick Henry against the Chargers’ statistically strong defense, and the brotherly coaching dynamic adding psychological intrigue.
Team Statistical Comparison
The final score of 30-23 reflected a closely contested game, with both teams finishing with 19 first downs and nearly identical time of possession. However, Baltimore’s offensive efficiency proved decisive, as the Ravens accumulated 389 total yards compared to the Chargers’ 285, demonstrating their ability to generate bigger plays despite similar opportunities.
Conversion Efficiency: The Ravens excelled in critical situations, converting all three of their fourth down attempts while methodically moving the chains. This tactical aggression contrasted with the Chargers’ more conservative approach and proved instrumental in maintaining scoring drives, particularly during Baltimore’s 14-play, 70-yard touchdown drive in the fourth quarter.
Red Zone Execution: While both teams reached scoring positions with similar frequency, the Ravens’ ability to finish drives with touchdowns rather than field goals created the point differential that decided the game. Baltimore scored three touchdowns on their red zone appearances, while the Chargers settled for field goals before adding a consolation touchdown in the game’s final minute.
Penalty Impact: The Ravens accumulated 93 penalty yards throughout the game, continuing a concerning seasonal trend that nearly derailed early drives. However, these were offset by crucial pass interference calls against the Chargers’ secondary that extended Baltimore scoring drives, including one that set up Rashod Bateman’s 40-yard touchdown reception just before halftime.
Key Player Performances
Quarterback Analysis
Lamar Jackson (Ravens): Passed for 251 yards with two touchdowns (including a 40-yard strike to Rashod Bateman) and added 47 rushing yards with another score on the ground. His passer rating of 112.3 reflected efficient decision-making, particularly on third and fourth downs.
Justin Herbert (Chargers): Threw for 264 yards with no interceptions but also no passing touchdowns. He contributed a rushing touchdown on the game’s opening drive but struggled to connect on deep passes, limiting the Chargers’ scoring potential.
Rushing Leaders
| Player | Team | Attempts | Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | Ravens | 24 | 140 | 5.8 | 0 |
| Justice Hill | Ravens | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 1 |
| Gus Edwards | Chargers | 14 | 57 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Justin Herbert | Chargers | 5 | 32 | 6.4 | 1 |
Derrick Henry: Delivered a dominant 140-yard performance on 24 carries, systematically wearing down the Chargers’ defensive front.
Justice Hill: Provided explosive change-of-pace rushing, highlighted by a 51-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter.
Gus Edwards: Added 57 yards and a touchdown but was limited due to game flow.
Receiving Highlights
- Rashod Bateman (Ravens): 3 receptions, 68 yards, 1 TD (40-yard score).
- Mark Andrews (Ravens): 5 catches, 54 yards, 1 TD.
- Ladd McConkey (Chargers): 7 receptions, 86 yards, most reliable target.
- Quentin Johnston (Chargers): Struggled with multiple dropped passes.
Defensive Impact Players
- Kyle Van Noy (Ravens): Recorded a crucial sack on Herbert during a fourth-quarter comeback attempt.
- Malik Harrison (Ravens): 9 tackles, anchored the run defense.
- Derwin James Jr. (Chargers): 11 tackles, versatile in run support.
- Khalil Mack & Joey Bosa (Chargers): Combined for just one sack, struggled to pressure Lamar Jackson.
Special Teams Performances
- Justin Tucker (Ravens): Perfect on all kicks, including a 45-yard field goal.
- Cameron Dicker (Chargers): Converted all field goals, including two from beyond 50 yards.
- Coverage Units: Ravens limited returner Derius Davis effectively, winning the field position battle.
Historical Context and Series Analysis
The Ravens’ victory extended their all-time record against the Chargers to 10-6. Baltimore has now won four of the last five contests dating back to 2015. The Harbaugh coaching dynamic added intrigue, marking their first clash since Super Bowl XLVII.
Historical Head-to-Head Comparison
| Statistic | Chargers | Ravens |
|---|---|---|
| Total Wins | 6 | 10 |
| Points Per Game | 18.3 | 21.6 |
| Home Win % | 44.4% | 66.7% |
| Away Win % | 33.3% | 55.6% |
| Biggest Victory | 34-33 | 22-10 |
Conclusion and Implications
The Baltimore Ravens’ 30-23 victory reinforced several critical strategic truths about both franchises while significantly altering the AFC playoff landscape. For the Ravens, their formula of power running (140 yards from Derrick Henry), efficient quarterback play (Lamar Jackson’s three total touchdowns), and clutch defensive stops proved sufficient to overcome a talented Chargers squad on the road. This performance demonstrated their championship credentials and ability to win against quality opposition in hostile environments, cementing their status as legitimate Super Bowl contenders.

